The HLG on “fake news” will advise the EU Commission on misinformation spreading across traditional and social media, and how to cope with its social and political consequences. All foreseen categories are present: 7 academics, 9 representatives of the written press & journalist unions, 7 from broadcast news, 11 from civil society and fact-checking, and 6 representatives of social media platforms.

Here is one more statistic: the expert group is composed of 25 men and 15 women (including a chairwoman).

The actual list, below has been enriched with links to individual profiles, and where applicable links to articles on “fake news” (further hints welcomed).

Academia: 7

Platform: 6

Press: 9

Civil Society/Fact checker: 11

Broadcaster: 7


The categories and stats above have been prepared rapidly by Fondation EURACTIV, and may be complemented or corrected: remarks are welcomed.


My own views?
Under my early hypothesis, five relevant solutions could help address the viral dissemination of misinformation: EU co-regulation, independent measurement of fake news, bundling fact-checkers’ inputs, fostering several ‘credibility indexes’, and platform algorithms to reflect a credibility index.

Read more here: #TackleFakeNews: Co-regulation? Leveraging media fact-checking into platform algorithms


Author :


  1. Thank you so much for this. I was into this issue and tired to tinker around to check if its possible but couldnt get it done. Now that i have seen the way you did it, thanks guys

  2. The article you share here is awesome. I really like and appreciate your work. I read your article deeply, the points you mentioned in this article are very helpful thanks for sharing.

  3. A very nice blog, I like the way you share very honestly and interestingly, through my blog I learned a lot of things. run 3

Leave a Reply